The red dwarf TRAPPIST-1 has the largest group of planets in a single stellar system that are the closest to being of Earth’s size. A recent study has found that all the seven planets have “remarkably” similar densities, thus providing scientists with the scope of exploring the variety of planetary systems that inhabit the universe. TRAPPIST-1 is located about 40 light-years away from us and has seven rocky planets revolving around it. Although it was not possible to capture their images, scientists have a calculated idea about their distance with each other and revolution pattern.
According to the data, if one stands on the surface on one of the planets, they will be able to see some of the neighbouring planets hovering above like we see the Moon.
These planets have commanded researchers interests since 2017 when it was discovered that three of the seven planets are located in the theoretical "habitable zone", which is the region where rocky planets are most likely to hold liquid water.
Given their similarity with our planet, scientists were hoping for them to have similar densities as well. But the latest study has stated that is not the case. While all of the seven plants do have similar densities to each other (they differ by three percent) and to the Earth, (they differ by eight percent) it is expected that they were also made up of materials that compose most rocky planets such as iron, oxygen, magnesium, and silicon. And here lies the problem. If they were indeed made up of similar components as that of Earth, they would have been a fraction less dense.
NASA says “TRAPPIST-1 planets are about eight percent less dense than they would be if they had the same makeup as our home planet”. This has led scientists to believe that there are other components and different mixtures of the known components that could have resulted in TRAPPIST-1’s planets’ density.
The study was published in the Planetary Science Journal on 22 January.
source https://www.firstpost.com/tech/science/seven-rocky-planets-of-trappist-1-might-be-similar-but-they-arent-the-same-study-9239551.html
